Once ‘Ugly’ Property Management Grows as U.S. Home Rentals Surge

Written by Hui-yong Yu
Published by Business Week

Nov. 29 (Bloomberg) — Meg McKennon’s workload has surged since the Seattle real estate agent switched to managing residential properties. Now she gets paid for finding tenants instead of buyers — an easier task as rentals soar.

“In the past two months, my business probably came close to tripling,” said McKennon, who started management company Dwellings Seattle Real Estate in 2010 after selling houses for 15 years.

When a couple moved out of a two-bedroom house managed by McKennon in August, before the lease was up, she increased the monthly rent by $200 to $1,900 — and still had her pick of applicants. “I could have rented it 10 times over,” she said.

Just as the U.S. housing boom gave birth to such homebuyer websites as Zillow Inc. and Redfin Corp., services for rental properties are thriving following a surge in foreclosures and stiffening of mortgage standards. Membership in the National Association of Residential Property Managers has almost doubled in five years to a record 3,400 members, according to the Chesapeake, Virginia-based trade group.

“We are riding this sea change in how housing is changing in the U.S.,” said Reggie Brown, chief executive officer of All Property Management LLC, a Seattle-based Web service that sells property managers leads on homeowners who want to lease out their properties. “The only growth is rentals.”

Renter household formation surpassed new owner-occupied homes in 2007 for the first time since 1985 and has held the lead since, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. An average of 718,500 renter households a year were formed from 2007 to 2010, while owner-occupied households decreased at an average annual rate of 147,250 during the same period.

Even Seattle-based Zillow, known for its Zestimate home- price estimates, added rental listings almost two years ago.

‘Dramatic Shift’

“There has been a dramatic shift toward renting,” Chris Herbert, research director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, said in a telephone interview.

Property managers for rentals handle such tasks as screening tenants, helping landlords set rents, resolving disputes and ensuring lawns get mowed. They charge homeowners about 8 percent to 14 percent of the monthly rent, depending on the manager and city.

“It used to be no one did property management,” said Alan Townsend, a San Diego real estate agent who has managed homes for the past 16 years. “It was the ugly part of the business.”

Lower Pay

While one home sale can earn a real estate agent $10,000 for two months’ work, property managers may make $1,800 per property per year, Townsend said.

“Real estate agents think we’re crazy — except when they have no income,” he said. “Those agents are now flooding into the market.”

Property managers face a challenge in proving they are a benefit to homeowners, said Rob LeRoy, marketing director for Dwellings Seattle Real Estate.

“They are known to cut corners, have poor customer service and tend to create hostile relationships with tenants — at least, that’s a common perception in the eyes of the public,” he said. “We’ve certainly done our best to prove that property management companies can behave ethically and professionally, yet still be profitable.”

More competition has driven down the average fee for property managers to about 8 percent of one month’s rent from 10 percent in the San Diego area, Townsend said.

Rentals Gain

At a time when many Americans are wary of buying a home or can’t qualify for a mortgage, rentals are gaining in cities that have relatively robust job growth, such as Seattle, or pools of transient workers, including Washington, Los Angeles and Las Vegas.

In the greater Washington, D.C., area, about 70 percent of Reliance Property Management Group LLC’s 100-plus clients are homeowners who were transferred out of the area by their employers, said Angela Gammon, co-owner of the Leesburg, Virginia-based company.

“We’re in a very transitional area with government contractors — military and so forth,” said Gammon, who used All Property Management to find clients when she got into the business in 2004.

U.S. apartment vacancies fell to a five-year low in the third quarter, enabling landlords to increase rents to an average effective rate of $1,004 a month from $997 in the second quarter and $981 a year earlier, according to Reis Inc., a New York-based real estate research company.

Attracting New Clients

“When rents go up, that gives people enough cash flow to hire professional management,” said Diane Castanes, a partner at Phillips Real Estate Services in Seattle, which manages about 140 apartment complexes as well as a portfolio of single-family homes and condominium associations. “Now with the rental market so strong, we are bringing in an increasing number of single- family investors as new clients.”

Handling the rental — and re-rental — of a home is often too much trouble for an owner, said Jay Young, co-founder of Real Property Associates, a management company in Seattle.

“There are a lot of hairy things,” he said. “You can have the best-screened tenant and who knows? Maybe they lose their job, or go nuts and skip out, or bring a dog when the owner doesn’t want that. I’d say 95 percent of the time things go smoothly, but there’s always that 5 percent that takes 20 or 30 percent of your time.”

Competition for clients has intensified to the point where many property managers are advertising their websites directly on search engines rather than paying to list on a site such as All Property Management’s, Brown said.

Here to Stay

Still, such services as All Property Management and RentList.com probably are here to stay as property management becomes more popular, said Michael E. Nelson, president of Excalibur Home Management LLC in the Atlanta suburb of Cumming. Nelson has used both services to find clients for Excalibur, which manages about 1,250 properties and is expanding throughout Georgia.

Nelson said he expects more rental properties to shift to professional management as regulations governing landlords become more complex. A 2008 rule, for example, requires renovations or repairs affecting lead-based paint in homes built before 1978 to be carried out by a contractor certified by the Environmental Protection Agency, he said.

Managed by Owners

It’s difficult to find precise figures for the percentage of U.S. rental housing that’s professionally managed. The Census Bureau surveyed rental-property owners and managers in 1995 and is working on a new rental survey that will be released toward the end of next year, said Richard A. Levy, a statistician at the agency.

Of about 8.8 million single-family rental homes in the U.S., including detached houses, condominiums and mobile homes, about 19 percent were professionally managed and about 78 percent managed by owners, with non-responses accounting for the remainder, according to the Census Bureau’s Property Owners and Managers Survey in 1995.

“I believe over the next 20 years that’s going to start shifting closer to 50-50,” Nelson said. “As the law becomes more difficult for individual landlords to navigate, they’re going to need to hire a professional property manager.”

It’s hard to make money overseeing single-family homes, said Tim Overland, chief operating officer of both Security Properties, a Seattle-based apartment developer and investor, and its management affiliate, Madrona Ridge Residential, which handles about 3,000 apartment units.

“It’s a very low margin business and a low barrier to entry business,” he said. “In order to make that business financially feasible, you’ve got to have quite a few units under management.”

Housing Crisis

Property management may have a role to play in fixing the housing crisis, said Brown of All Property Management.

In August, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, regulator of mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, sought ideas on handling foreclosed homes held by the government, which totaled 248,000 as of June — almost one-third of the total U.S. foreclosed homes seized by lenders. Brown filed a suggestion with the FHFA that the homes be put up for rent with property managers hired to oversee them.

“If institutions were more thoughtful about how they manage their real estate portfolios, the market would recover faster,” Brown said. “We can be a clearinghouse to help them find skilled property managers.”

Housing probably won’t recover until 2015 as consumers and banks reduce their debt loads and the employment market recovers slowly, Brown said.

“What’s going to change is the percentage of U.S. households that are rental versus owner-occupied,” he said. “It’s now almost 40 percent, but that number is definitely going to grow.”

–Editors: Daniel Taub, Christine Maurus

To contact the reporter on this story: Hui-yong Yu in Seattle at hyu@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Kara Wetzel at kwetzel@bloomberg.net

See article here:

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-06/once-ugly-property-management-grows-as-u-s-home-rentals-surge.html

Owners of historic downtown Seattle building in default

Written by: Eric Pryne
Published by: Seattle Times

Downtown Seattle’s historic Fourth and Pike Building is in foreclosure, public records indicate.

The California investors who bought the 10-story building in April 2008 have defaulted on their loan, according to a notice filed on the lender’s behalf with King County this week.

If the debt isn’t repaid first, the 1926 Gothic Revival building will be sold at auction March 9, the notice says.

That won’t happen, the owners contend.

“We’re in the process of recapitalizing with the same lender,” said John Klimp, president of Mayfield Investment of Palo Alto, Calif. “We’ll have our deal closed within a month and this’ll all go away.”

An entity led by Mayfield paid $25.15 million for the building.

Klimp said at the time that he planned to spend an additional $6 million on extensive renovations of the building’s interior.

“In some places it still looks like Humphrey Bogart lives there,” he said then.

Wrightwood Capital of Chicago loaned the new owners $28 million for the acquisition and renovation.

That loan matured May 1 but has not been repaid, according to this week’s notice.

The recession hit Fourth and Pike hard, Klimp acknowledged. When Mayfield bought the building in 2008, “we had a whole different future looking at us,” he said.

Washington Mutual collapsed less than six months later, vacating more than 1.5 million square feet of downtown office space, forcing rents down, and pushing vacancies to new highs. But the market has improved lately, Klimp said.

His 100,000-square-foot building, at 1424 Fourth Ave., is about 35 percent vacant, according to commercial real-estate database Officespace.com. Klimp said recent lease commitments will reduce that to 20 or 25 percent.

The building’s ground floor is retail — Ben Bridge Jewelers’ downtown store has been a tenant for more than 70 years — while the top nine floors are offices.

Mayfield’s Web page for the Fourth and Pike Building indicates that, while much remodeling has been completed, more is planned.

Public records show several contractors have filed liens against the owners.

The Fourth and Pike Building was Mayfield’s first acquisition in the Seattle area. The company also owns office and apartment buildings in the San Francisco Bay Area and Portland.

Along with the Joshua Green Building across Fourth Avenue — also recently renovated — the Fourth and Pike Building once was the center of Seattle’s “Diamond District,” with many small offices leased by jewelry-related businesses.

See article here:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2016960827_fourthpike08.html

Housing the Echo Boomers – Next Big Real Estate Opportunity ?

Written by: Peter J Reilly

Published by Forbes.com

Tim Smith blogs on the “Echo Boom”, also known as Generation Y (Americans born between 1980 – 1995).  His most recent guest post indicated that Echo Boomers might not be that excited about becoming homeowners.  There are a lot of them and they will have to live somewhere, so there may still be opportunity in housing them.

Seize the Next Biggest Financial Opportunity

Are you an investor in real estate?  Are you a real estate agent?  Are you a homeowner looking to sell?  Are you trying to rent a nice apartment complex?  If you have any interest in housing, you may have cringed when reading about the Millennial attitude toward housing.  However, whether Echo Boomers rent or buy, they will need housing, and there are 80 million of them.  In other words, recognizing their demographics and preferences will separate the winners from the losers and that has huge financial implications in a generation as large as the Echo Boomers.

Who Will Buy and Who Will Rent?

In the past, I’ve argued that single moms and females will produce the strongest demand for housing in the future.  Then a few articles I covered mentioned a different take: the new renter is probably a single mom.  However, single moms and females of the Millennial generation listed owning a home as a financial goal more than males, even though males are more likely to be homeowners (by a 7% margin).  Married Echo Boomers also reported home ownership as a financial goal (approximately 21% of Echo Boomers are married).  As this generation matures, I’d expect the strongest demand to come from these three segments of the Millennial generation.

Many single males stated that home ownership was not a financial goal.  A few of these male renters wanted to buy land and build their own home outside of the city (approximately 10-15%), while the rest seemed satisfied with renting.  Those in the real estate industry should be aware that renters are a profitable group, if you build housing that renters want.

Are there exceptions to these trends?  Of course, and if the Millennial generation sees its marriage rate increase, there will be a growing demographic to sell homes to.  In some cases Echo Boomers may opt to live with relatives or friends rent-free due to their economic circumstances.  But even the ones who lived with their relatives or friends told me that they planned to be independent soon.

What Will They Want?

    For now, most of Generation Y seem to want modest homes, the demand of which may be indicative of their young age.  But it might also represent a demographic shift against large housing that is often overpriced and unnecessary.  Because many Echo Boomers don’t have or make significant money, a small house offers the ability to save on energy.  Other traits of housing that Echo Boomers want:
·         Some Echo Boomers prefer to drive less or take public transportation.  This indicates that they would prefer housing that is close to work, school and social areas.  Keep in mind, that close housing will save them money so that they can afford other things in the area (an opportunity to attract businesses).
·         For apartments, modern designs with social areas are replacing old apartments (and this will continue to grow).  An example of this in terms of design, an example would be to replace carpet with hardwood floors.  Builders and real estate developers can also attract businesses that offer social areas, like coffee shops, to open near the area.
·         Since some Echo Boomers lack financial resources, always consider how your housing saves them money.  Is it small and efficient?  “This place will save you money on bills.”  Is it close to their favorite places?  “This place will save you money and time on transportation.”  Does it offer their favorite activities?  “This place offers a gym without an additional cost.”  Always create win-win situations – it communicates that you value your customers.

Time Will Be the Ultimate Judge

While Echo Boomers may mature like older generations and buy houses in the suburbs, they may not.  Time will answer questions about the housing demand from the Millennial generation, and what type of housing they’ll prefer.  Either experts are right when they state that Echo Boomers are extending adolescence, or the zeitgeist of “making it” is changing for this generation.  For now, anyone with a financial interest in real estate should pay attention to trends and find ways to meet their consumers’ needs.  And best of all, you can win with the renters or the owners – you’re not stuck with one opportunity.

See the article here:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2011/12/21/housing-the-echo-boomers-next-big-real-estate-opportunity/

Rental-property managers find themselves in a sweet spot

Written by Hui-yong Yu
Published by: Seattle Times

Meg McKennon’s workload has surged since the Seattle real-estate agent switched to managing residential properties. Now she gets paid for finding tenants instead of buyers, an easier task as rentals soar.

“In the past two months, my business probably came close to tripling,” said McKennon, who started management company Dwellings Seattle Real Estate in 2010 after selling houses for 15 years.

When a couple moved out of a two-bedroom house managed by McKennon in August, before the lease was up, she increased the monthly rent by $200 to $1,900 — and still had her pick of applicants. “I could have rented it 10 times over,” she said.

Just as the U.S. housing boom gave birth to such homebuyer websites as Zillow and Redfin, services for rental properties are thriving after a surge in foreclosures and stiffening of mortgage standards. Membership in the National Association of Residential Property Managers has almost doubled in five years, to a record 3,400 members, according to the Chesapeake, Va.-based trade group.

“We are riding this sea change,” said Reggie Brown, chief executive officer of All Property Management, a Seattle-based Web service that sells property managers leads on homeowners who want to lease out their properties. “The only growth is rentals.”

Renter-household formation surpassed new owner-occupied homes in 2007 for the first time since 1985 and has held the lead since, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. An average of 718,500 renter households a year formed from 2007 to 2010, while owner-occupied households decreased at an average annual rate of 147,250 during the same period.

Even Seattle-based Zillow, known for its Zestimate home-price estimates, added rental listings almost two years ago.

“There has been a dramatic shift toward renting,” said Chris Herbert, research director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies.

Property managers for rentals handle such tasks as screening tenants, helping landlords set rents, resolving disputes and ensuring lawns get mowed. They charge homeowners 8 to 14 percent of the monthly rent, depending on the manager and city.

“The ugly part”

“It used to be no one did property management,” said Alan Townsend, a San Diego real-estate agent who has managed homes for the past 16 years. “It was the ugly part of the business.”

While one home sale can earn a real-estate agent $10,000 for two months’ work, property managers may make $1,800 per property per year, Townsend said.

“Real-estate agents think we’re crazy, except when they have no income,” he said. “Those agents are now flooding into the market.”

Property managers face a challenge in proving they are a benefit to homeowners, said Rob LeRoy, marketing director for Dwellings Seattle Real Estate.

“They are known to cut corners, have poor customer service and tend to create hostile relationships with tenants — at least, that’s a common perception in the eyes of the public,” he said. “We’ve certainly done our best to prove that property-management companies can behave ethically and professionally, yet still be profitable.”

More competition has driven down the average fee for property managers to about 8 percent of one month’s rent from 10 percent in the San Diego area, Townsend said.

At a time many Americans are wary of buying a home or can’t qualify for a mortgage, rentals are gaining in cities that have relatively robust job growth, such as Seattle, or pools of transient workers, including Washington, Los Angeles and Las Vegas.

In the greater Washington, D.C., area, about 70 percent of Reliance Property Management Group’s 100-plus clients are homeowners transferred out of the area by their employers, said Angela Gammon, co-owner of the Leesburg, Va.-based company.

“We’re in a very transitional area with government contractors — military and so forth,” said Gammon, who used All Property Management to find clients when she got into the business in 2004.

U.S. apartment vacancies fell to a five-year low in the third quarter, enabling landlords to increase rents to an average effective rate of $1,004 a month from $997 in the second quarter and $981 a year earlier, according to Reis, a New York-based real-estate research company.

“When rents go up, that gives people enough cash flow to hire professional management,” said Diane Castanes, a partner at Phillips Real Estate Services in Seattle, which manages about 140 apartment complexes and a portfolio of single-family homes and condominium associations. “Now with the rental market so strong, we are bringing in an increasing number of single-family investors as new clients.”

“Hairy things”

Handling the rental — and re-rental — of a home is often too much trouble for an owner, said Jay Young, co-founder of Real Property Associates, a management company in Seattle.

“There are a lot of hairy things,” he said. “You can have the best-screened tenant and who knows? Maybe they lose their job, or go nuts and skip out, or bring a dog when the owner doesn’t want that. I’d say 95 percent of the time things go smoothly, but there’s always that 5 percent that takes 20 or 30 percent of your time.”

Competition for clients has intensified to where many property managers are advertising their websites directly on search engines rather than paying to list on a site such as All Property Management’s, Brown said.

Still, such services as All Property Management and RentList.com probably are here to stay as property management becomes more popular, said Michael Nelson, president of Excalibur Home Management in the Atlanta suburb of Cumming. Nelson has used both services to find clients for Excalibur, which manages about 1,250 properties and is expanding throughout Georgia.

Nelson said he expects more rental properties to shift to professional management as regulations governing landlords become more complex. A 2008 rule, for example, requires renovations or repairs affecting lead-based paint in homes built before 1978 to be carried out by a contractor certified by the Environmental Protection Agency, he said.

It’s difficult to find precise figures for the percentage of U.S. rental housing that’s professionally managed. The Census Bureau surveyed rental-property owners and managers in 1995 and is working on a new rental survey that will be released toward the end of next year, said Richard Levy, a statistician at the agency.

Of about 8.8 million single-family rental homes in the U.S., including detached houses, condominiums and mobile homes, about 19 percent were professionally managed and about 78 percent managed by owners, with nonresponses accounting for the remainder, according to the Census Bureau’s Property Owners and Managers Survey in 1995.

“I believe over the next 20 years that’s going to start shifting closer to 50-50,” Nelson said. “As the law becomes more difficult for individual landlords to navigate, they’re going to need to hire a professional property manager.”

It’s hard to make money overseeing single-family homes, said Tim Overland, chief operating officer of Security Properties, a Seattle-based apartment developer and investor, and its management affiliate, Madrona Ridge Residential, which handles about 3,000 apartment units.

“It’s a very low-margin business and a low-barrier-to-entry business,” he said. “To make that business financially feasible, you’ve got to have quite a few units under management.”

Property management may have a role to play in fixing the housing crisis, said Brown, of All Property Management.

In August, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), regulator of mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, sought ideas on handling foreclosed homes held by the government, which totaled 248,000 as of June — almost one-third of the total U.S. foreclosed homes seized by lenders.

Brown filed a suggestion with the FHFA that the homes be put up for rent with property managers hired to oversee them.

“If institutions were more thoughtful about how they manage their real-estate portfolios, the market would recover faster,” Brown said. “We can be a clearinghouse to help them find skilled property managers.”

Housing probably won’t recover until 2015 as consumers and banks reduce their debt loads and the employment market recovers slowly, Brown said.

“What’s going to change is the percentage of U.S. households that are rental versus owner-occupied,” he said. “It’s now almost 40 percent, but that number is definitely going to grow.”

 

See the article here:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/realestate/2016942540_realmanagement11.html

RAISE YOUR RENTAL STANDARDS

Written by Robert Cai

Published by RHAGP.org

In an interview with Multifamily Executive Magazine,
James McClelland, the CEO of Mack Cos. of Tinley
Park, Ill and 36-year veteran of the investment real
estate market, said:
“What we’re getting now versus what
we got before are residents with better
income: people in solid situations who for
one reason or another were forced out of
their property. We have more people to
choose from than ever before. As a result,
through quantity comes quality. Of course,
rents go up, too, but that’s really not as
important to me as having good renters.”
That is good news for landlords because, in most
places in the country, we are seeing a similar
scenario.
What that also means for landlords is that we can
set our rental standards higher. No more renting to
someone with income where 50 percent is going to
rent, a spotty rental history, and two weeks on the
job. We can now ask for income three times rent,
good rental history and long-term employment. And
there is no excuse not to. We owe it to ourselves to
begin protecting our investments by demanding good
tenants.
So where should our standards be?
Of course, it all depends on the property. Obviously, a
400 square foot studio apartment will draw a different
demographic of tenant than a 4,000 square foot, six
bedroom, four-car garage, swimming pool and spa,
360-degree view property. And our rental standards
will refl ect that.
How about the studio apartment? Look at the
standards now? How much can those standards go
up before they drive off prospective renters? This is
not an exact science; it is more like trial and error. But
regardless of the lack of exactitude, those standards
need to come up if we are to hope to ensure success
in this business. Each landlord needs to decide what
the market will bear.
Here’s the problem if standards stay the same. We
are obligated both by ethics and the Fair Housing
Act to take the fi rst acceptable applicant who shows
up, screen him, and accept or reject on the basis of
the tenancy standards we have published. If a more
qualifi ed applicant shows up after the less-qualifi ed
one, ethics demand that we still screen the fi rst
applicant fi rst and accept him if everything checks out.
Raise the standards and that lower-quality applicant

might not qualify to rent from us, so the more qualifi ed
applicant gets to be our new tenant.
McClelland said in the interview that those higher
standards are working for them and they are getting a
higher-quality tenant.
He said, “We do all of our own screening, including a
credit check; an interview with their current landlord; a
site survey of their existing home, because how they
maintain their unit is indicative of how they will likely
maintain our unit. We talk to their employer regarding
their prospect for long-term employment; we do a skip
trace; and we do a criminal background check.” Best
of all, Mack Cos. has a four-month waiting list.
How much can you raise your rental standards?
The market is fi nally turning in favor of landlords
and we can begin to get the high-quality tenants our
properties deserve.
Robert Cain is a nationally-recognized
speaker and writer on property
management and real estate issues.
For a free sample copy of the Rental
Property Reporter call 800-654-5456 or
visit their web site at www.rentalprop.
com.”

See the article here:

http://www.rhagp.org/update/201112.pdf

How to Downsize Your Home

Edited byAnne Walk and 12 others
Published by WikiHow

“Moving to a smaller place? Over time, we tend to accumulate stuff - lots of stuff. We have drawers full of stuff, gifts that we have never used (and never will), furniture we don’t really need but keep “just in case” and items that we’ve had for years may be difficult to part with due to nothing more than familiarity while serving no functional purpose. Now is the time to get rid of excess baggage (literally!) and pare down to the essentials.”   To get the steps and read the complete article follow this link: http://www.wikihow.com/Downsize-Your-Home

Behind the Numbers: Apartments for the Holidays

Written by Dawn Wotapka and Alan Zibel
Published by: The Wall Street Journal

 

Looks like the real-estate industry got a holiday gift. Thanks to apartment construction, U.S. home building climbed to the highest level in 19 months during November and construction permits grew.

As we report, home construction last month jumped 9.3% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 685,000 from October, the Commerce Department reported Tuesday. The results topped forecasts: Economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires expected housing starts would come in at 630,000.

November’s increase was driven by a 25.3% surge in multifamily homes, which are benefitting as more Americans burned by the housing crash become renters. Still, construction of single-family homes, which has slowed dramatically in recent years, ticked up 2.3%.

The data showed newly issued building permits, a gauge of future construction, rose 5.7% from a month earlier to the highest rate since March 2010. Permits in November had been projected to fall 1.7%.

The results sent shares of home builders—which have spent much of the year in the red—and multifamily operators on a tear Tuesday. Shares of builder Pulte added 8%, while Lennar gained 5%. Another sign of optimism? Lennar just entered the Seattle market. Multifamily operators also saw gains. Landlord UDR added 2.4%, while Mid-America saw a 3.2% gain.

Here’s what industry watchers had to say:

Ian Shepherdson, economist, HFE: “Growth in rental demand is driving construction of rental units; with the rental vacancy rate falling but still well above previous lows we think this story has much further to run. …The single-family sector will continue to lag but the surge in sales reported by the NAHB suggests the sector is beginning to wake from its long sleep; expect sustained gains in sales and start ahead.”

Paul Diggle, economist, Capital Economics: “Housing starts rose strongly in November, building on the gains seen since the start of the year. By historical standards, homebuilding activity is still very depressed, but at least it appears to be on an established upward trend.”

Steve Blitz, economist, ITG Investment Research: “The reason rents were rising is that through the past 15 or years there has been an underbuilding of rental properties because typical renters were increasingly able to garner cheap financing to buy a house. Those days are gone as far as mortgage financing are concerned yet the population continues to expand. With the economy recovering, weak as it is, new households are being formed and they need a place to live.”

 

To see post follow this link:

http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2011/12/20/behind-the-numbers-apartments-for-the-holidays/

Ballard streetcar could get a boost from Sound Transit

Photo: Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Andy Rogers / Seattle Post-Intelligencer

 

Written BY SCOTT GUTIERREZ, SEATTLEPI.COM STAFF

Published 09:56 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 2011 on Seattle PI

 
Planning for a future streetcar line between downtown and Ballard could get on track a little quicker with $2 million from Sound Transit.

A regional transit package approved in 2008 to extend light rail to the Eastside included money to study a future high-capacity transit line that would reach Ballard.
But Sound Transit didn’t plan to start the study until 2015 or later. As The Seattle Times reported Tuesday, it would now be timed to coincide with Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn’s efforts to extend the city’s streetcar system.
That would allow the city and Sound Transit to conduct a “detailed analysis of alignments and technologies that will enable us to meet the longer-term demand for transit between some of our the fastest growing neighborhoods and downtown,” according to the mayor’s office.
Sound Transit’s executive committee voted last week to recommend including the money in its 2012 budget. The full governing board will vote Dec. 15.
The city already has money for early design work on a downtown streetcar that would connect the South Lake Union line with the First Hill Streetcar, which will open in 2013. That study is paid for with a $900,000 federal grant, $300,000 from the Seattle Department of Transportation, and $800,000 from the sale of a maintenance yard.
City officials are talking with Sound Transit and the Federal Transit Administration about combining the downtown and Ballard studies, mayoral spokesman Aaron Pickus said Tuesday.
The city’s recently upgraded Transit Master Plan identified several corridors as ripe for investment in high-capacity transit, such as a rapid streetcar line. The city estimated a future rail line from Ballard to downtown could carry up to 26,000 riders, of whom 12,500 would be new to transit. That corridor also was highlighted in Sound Transit’s long-range plan.
During his campaign, McGinn pledged to bring voters a plan to extend light rail service to neighborhoods like Ballard within two years.
A proposed multi-purpose $60 car-tab fee, which would have provided $18 million for streetcar planning, failed in last month’s election. McGinn had initially proposed an $80 car-tab fee. After the ballot measure failed, McGinn said he thought it should have included more money for transit to win over voters.
McGinn and City Council President Richard Conlin, who both sit on Sound Transit’s board, support accelerating Sound Transit’s plan to study the corridor, Pickus said.
“It shows there is a real commitment on a lot of levels for this kind of work,” he said.
Visit seattlepi.com’s home page for more Seattle news. Scott Gutierrez can be reached at 206-448-8334 or scottgutierrez@seattlepi.com. Follow Scott on Twitter at twitter.com/2_scoops.

Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/local/transportation/article/Ballard-streetcar-could-get-a-boost-from-Sound-2348541.php#ixzz1h6lGBgu4

 

See the article here:

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/transportation/article/Ballard-streetcar-could-get-a-boost-from-Sound-2348541.php

Brentwood Apartments Now Available!

Gallery

This gallery contains 3 photos.

Be the first to live in these beautiful old world charm homes that have just been remodeled! Available January 1st!!! Apartment Features: A few blocks from Lake Union and University of Washington! Extremely convenient bus lines, INCREDIBLE view of the … Continue reading